BP fuel terminal given go-ahead
09.25.2009 - NEWS
A massive fuel storage terminal proposed by BP has been given the go-ahead despite the objections of nearby Seaview residents. The decision, which follows a four-day consent hearing, allows the company to build seven storage tanks on a site at Pt Howard. It also allows BP to discharge "potentially contaminated water" into the Lower Hutt stormwater system which flows into Wellington Harbour though the company says the water will be clean.

BP has welcomed the decision, which was backed by both Hutt City Council and Greater Wellington regional council. But residents say the consents are “sad for the harbour”.
Last month’s hearing covered every aspect of the project, from fire hazards to noise concerns to worries about the Petone aquifer beneath the site.
The three hearing commissioners overwhelmingly agreed with BP’s evidence.
Any adverse effects from discharges to the stormwater system would be “no more than minor” because of BP’s measures to stop fuel contaminating such water, the commissioners said.
Concerns about noise, traffic, ongoing construction and other forms of contamination could also be mitigated, they concluded.
The terminal was appropriate for an industrial area and would be “in the wider regional interest in terms of supplying fuel”.
BP spokeswoman Diana Stretch said the company would tender for the work immediately. “Obviously we’re extremely pleased that consents have been granted and we’re looking forward to moving to the next stage of the process.”
There would always be opposition from residents to such a plan, but BP had tried hard to listen to local concerns, she said.
Terminal opponent Ewen McCann, who lives in nearby Nikau Rd, said he was disappointed.
He thought economic considerations had won out over environmental ones. “I think the commissioners have failed to do their job.”
It was undeniable that BP could still discharge potentially contaminated water, he said. “I think it’s sad for the harbour.”
Seaview Marina manager Alan McLellan said he was heartened by the commissioners’ confidence in BP’s equipment.
But the boats in his marina were worth up to $12 million and could be badly damaged by a discharge, he said.
“It’s really just that worry about what happens if there’s a malfunction.”
If approved, construction on the terminal could begin by early next year and take 15 years to build over three stages.
The first stage is expected to cost between $20 million and $25m.
The terminal will be able to store more than 50 million litres. BP says the tanks won’t rupture even in a 1-in-500-year quake.
However, 24,600 litres from a pipeline spill could enter the harbour after a fire or other emergency.

Have a wonderful Christmas, and a superb 2025!
12.24.2024 - NEWS
We, the TankTerminals.com & Insights Global team, would like to thank you for helping us bui... Read More
Duisburg Port Joins Green Corridor Between Brazil, Netherlands
12.24.2024 - NEWS
December 24, 2024 [Renewables Now]- The German Port of Duisburg on the Rhine River will be includ... Read More
ETFuels Picks Partners for USD-1bn-plus e-Methanol Plant in Texas
12.24.2024 - NEWS
December 24, 2024 [Renewables Now]- ETFuels has selected Belgian mechanical engineering specialis... Read More
ADNOC Secures Over 91 Percent Stake in Covestro
12.24.2024 - NEWS
December 24, 2024 [Market Screener]- The billion-euro takeover of Covestro by the Arab oil giant ... Read More